PVD Deposition Rate & Thickness Calculator
Calculate coating thickness from QCM frequency change using the Sauerbrey equation with tooling factor correction
Crystal & Material Parameters
⚡ Auto-Updateρf = film material density. Use bulk density for crystalline films; may vary for porous or amorphous films.
Z = (ρqμq)½ / (ρfμf)½. Z=1 uses Sauerbrey; Z≠1 uses Lu-Lewis Z-match equation.
Measurement Data
Enter as negative value for deposition. Positive ΔF indicates mass loss (etching/desorption).
Corrects for geometric differences between crystal and substrate positions. Calibrate with step profilometry.
Enter deposition time to calculate average deposition rate.
Crystal constants: Using AT-cut quartz with ρq = 2.648 g/cm³, μq = 2.947×10¹¹ g/(cm·s²)
Results
Understanding the Sauerbrey Equation
The Sauerbrey equation, developed by Günter Sauerbrey in 1959, relates the frequency change of a quartz crystal microbalance (QCM) to the mass deposited on its surface. It forms the basis for in-situ thickness monitoring in PVD (Physical Vapor Deposition) systems including thermal evaporation, e-beam evaporation, and sputtering.
Key assumption: The Sauerbrey equation assumes the deposited film is rigid, uniformly distributed, and thin compared to the crystal thickness. The film must also have negligible slip at the crystal-film interface.
The Fundamental Equation
The mass-frequency relationship is derived from the resonance condition of an AT-cut quartz crystal:
Δf = −(2Fq²/A√(ρqμq)) × Δm
Where the sensitivity factor Cf = 2Fq²/√(ρqμq) is characteristic of the crystal. For a 6 MHz crystal, Cf ≈ 8.15 ng/(cm²·Hz).
Converting to Film Thickness
Since mass = density × volume, and volume = area × thickness, we can express film thickness as:
t = −(Δf × √(ρqμq)) / (2Fq² × ρf)
Tooling Factor Correction
The tooling factor accounts for geometric differences between the crystal sensor and substrate positions in the deposition chamber. Due to:
- Different distances from the evaporation source
- Angular distribution of the vapor flux (cosine law)
- Shadowing effects and chamber geometry
The actual substrate thickness typically differs from the crystal reading. The tooling factor is defined as:
TF = (Actual substrate thickness / Crystal-measured thickness) × 100%
Calibration essential: Tooling factors must be experimentally determined for each source-substrate-crystal geometry using a traceable thickness measurement method (profilometry, ellipsometry, XRR, or AFM).
Z-Match Method for Thick Films
For films thicker than ~2% of the crystal thickness, acoustic impedance mismatch becomes significant. The Z-match equation provides improved accuracy:
t = (Nqρq)/(πZρfFq) × arctan[Z × tan(π(Fq−F)/Fq)]
Where Z is the acoustic impedance ratio. This calculator uses the linear Sauerbrey approximation but allows Z-ratio input for reference.
Limitations and Validity
- Film rigidity: Soft, viscoelastic, or liquid-like films violate the rigid-film assumption
- Mass loading: Accuracy decreases for Δf/Fq > 2% (roughly >200 nm for typical materials)
- Uniformity: Non-uniform films cause frequency instability and measurement errors
- Temperature: Crystal frequency drifts with temperature (~±2 ppm/°C for AT-cut). Water-cooled crystal holders are recommended for high-temperature depositions. Allow crystals to stabilize before measuring.
- Stress effects: Highly stressed films can shift frequency independent of mass
Crystal Lifetime
QCM crystals have finite operational life. As mass accumulates, oscillation quality degrades:
- 0–2% loading: Excellent accuracy, Sauerbrey equation valid
- 2–3% loading: Use Z-match for best results; some accuracy loss
- 3–5% loading: Crystal nearing end of life; increased noise likely
- >5% loading: Replace crystal; oscillation may fail or become unstable
Monitor the Crystal Life indicator above to track cumulative loading for the current measurement.
Material Density Reference
Common PVD coating materials and their bulk densities. Actual film density may vary based on deposition conditions.
| Material | Density (g/cm³) | Z-Ratio | Common Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gold (Au) | 19.30 | 0.381 | Electrodes, contacts, optical |
| Silver (Ag) | 10.50 | 0.529 | Mirrors, antimicrobial |
| Aluminum (Al) | 2.70 | 1.08 | Reflectors, interconnects |
| Copper (Cu) | 8.90 | 0.437 | Interconnects, seed layers |
| Chromium (Cr) | 8.25 | 0.296 | Adhesion layers, hard coatings |
| Titanium (Ti) | 4.50 | 0.628 | Adhesion layers, biomedical |
| Platinum (Pt) | 21.45 | 0.245 | Electrodes, catalysis |
| SiO₂ | 2.20 | 1.07 | Dielectrics, optical |
| TiO₂ | 4.23 | 0.48 | AR coatings, photocatalysis |
| ITO | 5.61 | — | Transparent electrodes |
Note: Film density can differ significantly from bulk values, especially for: (1) low-temperature depositions, (2) high deposition rates, (3) reactive sputtering, and (4) oblique-angle deposition. When possible, measure film density directly.
References
AI & Computational Tools for Researchers
Explore our curated guides to the best free AI tools for literature discovery, data analysis, computational modeling, and more.
